4 Reasons Why I Won’t Be Moving to a 55+ Active Adult Community

Sun City, Arizona is the second-oldest planned retirement community in the United States.
Sun City, Arizona is the second-oldest planned retirement community in the United States.

When you think about what type of community you plan to live after you retire, what comes to mind?

Are you giving serious consideration to living in an age-restricted 55+ active adult community?

Chances are, the younger you are today, the less likely you are to choose such a community after you retire.

As I write this, I am 59 and my husband is 57. We have no desire to move to one of these communities.

Occasionally, I bring this question up in conversations with friends who are our age or perhaps slightly older. No one we know is planning to live in one, either.

Speaking for myself, here are four reasons why I am opting to live out my retirement years in the community-at-large, not an age-restricted enclave.

1.      They are too remote.

We live in Chandler, which is a suburb located about 20 miles southeast of Phoenix, Arizona. Overall, we like it a lot, but occasionally we talk of moving closer to town to be closer to most of our friends and activities. We drive into Phoenix or Scottsdale often for band rehearsals, theatre, restaurants, or visiting with friends, and living closer to downtown Phoenix would shorten our drive.

On the other hand, most 55+ active adult communities in the Phoenix area are located on the outskirts of town. Sun City, Sun City West, Sun City Grand, Sun Lakes, Pebble Creek, Leisure World, and dozens of smaller communities sit on the edge of outer suburbia. Most of them are built on land that was available in larger masses and at lower prices, due to their remote locations.

Most retirement communities in other states are either built in previously undeveloped areas (such as The Villages in Florida) or on the outskirts of towns. For these communities, self-containment is the objective.

2.      The Home Owner’s Association (HOA) fees are too high.

We don’t play golf, tennis, or pickleball, nor would we probably avail ourselves of many of the activities held at the recreation centers. We would be paying for amenities we wouldn’t use.

What’s worse, for land-lease communities (such as most manufactured home and mobile home communities), the monthly fees are higher because they include rental of the land your home sits on. You’ll be paying that for the duration of your residency, and you’ll be at their mercy for price increases.

3.      We want to stay in the mainstream.

We enjoy the mix of people in all age ranges that we interact with in our bands. The younger folks in our bands are friendly towards us, and knowing them enables us to keep up with current culture and trends. Being around younger people keeps us youthful (relatively speaking).

We enjoy being part of a diverse population that we see when we are out in the community.

At the risk of sounding ageist, we don’t want to associate only with older people.

I have often read the claim that you are the average of the five people you hang around with the most, and I believe this to be true. I think that’s true in a wider context as well.

4.      We are concerned about not fitting in with the retirement community crowd.

Based on everything I’ve seen and read, 55+ active adult communities are overwhelmingly white, straight, Christian, and Republican. We are not part of three out of those four demographics. (We are white.) And while many white, straight, Christian Republicans might be welcoming of two married gay, non-Christian Democrats, many aren’t.

We don’t want to live the rest of our lives in a community in which we would feel marginalized or even ostracized. Of course, if most non-white/straight/Christian/Republican people eschew these communities, they won’t change.

I don’t think we would be any more attracted to a 55+ active adult community that was comprised almost entirely of LGBT, non-Christian Democrats either. We expect that we will be happiest in the community-at-large, where there is a wider range of ages, ethnicities, orientations, religions, and political viewpoints.

Truthfully, a Democratic majority does have its appeal, but that doesn’t stop us from living in a predominately Republican part of town now.

Golf carts are the primary mode of transportation in 55+ active adult communities such as The Villages, Florida.
Golf carts are the primary mode of transportation in 55+ active adult communities such as The Villages, Florida.

Are 55+ active adult communities losing their appeal?


I recently read Leisureville: Adventures in America’s Retirement Utopias, by Andrew D. Blechman. (This book was retitled Leisureville: Adventures in a World Without Children for the paperback and Kindle editions. More on this book in an upcoming post.)

The copyright date on this book is 2008, which means the data quoted in the book is about ten years old now. At that time, “active adult” housing was the fastest growing sector of the housing market.

However, back then there were already signs that the demand might be abating, even though an estimated 10,000 people turn 65 every day.

According to a generational marketing expert quoted in the book, people from pre-Boomer generations (and perhaps the earlier Boomers) valued conformity and community. They viewed retirement as a time to just kick back and relax after a long work career. Many of the people Blechman interviewed at The Villages in Florida expressed a keen desire to live with no children around. They flocked to communities such as The Villages and Sun City.

Today’s Boomers (at least the latter half of the generation born in 1946-1964) and those who will follow want anything but a giant one-size-fits-all age-segregated, planned community. They want homes that meet their unique needs, a more “authentic” lifestyle experience, and to be closer to families and friends.

People entering retirement today want purpose and fulfillment. They are more active, adventurous and individualistic. Today’s retirees are more likely to be starting businesses, pursuing creative passions, and exploring the world.

And just as the people entering retirement today rebelled against the “establishment” in the late 60s and early 70s, they are now rebelling against the old notions of what retirement should look like – including moving to age-segregated communities.

Today’s retirees don’t even think of themselves as being “older.” I know I don’t.

Of course, this is how I feel at age 59. When I’m 75, I might feel very differently. And perhaps active adult communities will evolve significantly over the next 10-15 years to embrace the desires and the diverse demographics of today’s America.

So far, I don’t see signs that this is happening.

What are your perceptions of 55+ active adult communities?

Are you considering moving to one – or have you? Why or why not?

Please share your thoughts in the comments below.


© 2016 Dave Hughes. All rights reserved.

Photo credits:

Sun City: Jack Miller. Some rights reserved.

The Villages: Ted Eytan. Some rights reserved.

10 thoughts on “4 Reasons Why I Won’t Be Moving to a 55+ Active Adult Community

  1. Simone

    I agree with reasons 4 and five the most. I love communities representing all ages, ethnicities and sexualities. Diversity of opinion and experience is healthy and we can learn from each other. As a high school teacher for 28 years I cannot imagine a life that does not include young people or children in it.
    The idea of Co housing has a great appeal for me. Multi-generational families/ couples live in community which emphasizes weekly shared meals. Practiced more in Europe than here in North America, this idea has resulted in building apartment complexes with community in mind.

    Reply
    1. Dave Hughes

      Hi Simone,

      Co-housing is a very interesting idea. I didn't know much about it, but learned more as I was researching an article I recently wrote, How to Survive and Thrive as a Single Person in Retirement.

      There are a few co-housing communities here in the U.S., but I hope the idea takes hold and grows.

      Thanks,
      Dave

      Reply
  2. Stacey Walsh

    I feel the same way. Although I'm a native NYer and used to living on top of everybody, I long for a small home that is just mine with no one under, above or to the sides of me. I love being in a mixed community....how boring to only see yourself wherever you look. That's why, when the time comes, I'm off to Athens, GA. Can't beat a university town for diversity, culture, education etc etc

    Reply
    1. William DeyErmand

      Good financial choice. Also the hospitals are great there. It is fourth on our list of choices.

      Reply
    2. Dave Hughes

      Moving to a university town is truly an excellent choice! I play in a couple jazz ensembles at local community colleges, and I value that highly as part of my retirement experience. Most of the members are either college students or fellow retirees!

      We are planning to take Spanish lessons at a local college this fall, too, to better prepare for travels we are planning to take.

      You can't beat local colleges and universities for free (or very cheap) concerts and theatre. They are grateful for the audience.

      Reply
  3. William DeyErmand

    Hi Dave,
    I think the view points on this article is right on. My wife and I recently rented a temporary apartment on the outskirts of a town, to experience apartment living. We really hated it even with loving the town. I do not see either of us living in a 55+ community where we may not fit for numerous reasons. I felt isolation living in an apartment compound with many residents! No thanks, I will live in my own home, near community at large, inviting over who ever I want without opinion or offense of another resident. All and all it was a good experience on apartment living.. It was cottage style living with neighbors on both sides, with no stairs. I learned about sizing down to 720 sq ft, I learned to get creative with a smaller living area, and to enjoy what you have with the one(s) you love. I learned that waiting for maintenance men to fix things is an inconvenience. It keeps me healthy to maintain a home and yard. I found the utilities to be as high as my home. I will find a smaller home around a 1000 sq ft, with lot enough for a garden! Boy did I miss evenings on the porch.

    Reply
    1. Dave Hughes

      We know we will downsize at some point in the future, but it will be to a similar living arrangement to what we enjoy now - our own house in an un-age-restricted neighborhood. The rent-vs-buy discussion is a good idea for a future article.

      Thanks!

      Reply
      1. William DeyErmand

        Just wanted to comment that you can get assisted living or total assistance in your own home, with a Doctor's prescription saying "Permanent". You must be "homebound" other than doctor appointments.

        Reply
  4. Kenny

    It is uncanny sometimes how you write about things that I think about. I live in east Mesa near several age-restricted communities which I walk through all the time for exercise. Heck, my mom lives in one. I can't recall ever seeing any skin color but white in those neighborhoods. I would be really worried about a lack of diversity living there. No, I foresee living in my suburban home in a regular neighborhood until my wife & I can no longer physically maintain the garden & yard. Then I think, depending on my age at that time, it's either a move into town in an apartment or condo, or perhaps into the assisted living facility that will be the lot in life for those who do not have a family option for support in our twilight years.

    Reply
    1. Dave Hughes

      That's how we foresee our future, too. We truly enjoy our private back yard for gardening, swimming, and a place for the dogs to "go." We can handle the yard maintenance for now, but at some point in the future, we may end up in a condo or a house on a very small lot. But it will be in the community-at-large, regardless.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *